Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 22;12(9):e0183460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183460

Table 8. Our best results of clustering metrics obtained with DAPG (with complexes of minimum size 3).

Network Algorithm Complexes Reference FMeasure Acc MMR
Collins DAPGU(BFS) rFfN 633
CYC2008 0.7248 0.7234 0.7183
SGD 0.6037 0.5409 0.5956
MIPS 0.5449 0.5417 0.4956
Krogan Core DAPGU(DFS) rIfN 649
CYC2008 0.6782 0.6242 0.5059
SGD 0.6266 0.4519 0.4153
MIPS 0.4612 0.3793 0.3085
Krogan Extended DAPGU(DFS) rIfN 830
CYC2008 0.5411 0.6226 0.4724
SGD 0.4836 0.4400 0.3662
MIPS 0.3724 0.3679 0.2747
Gavin DAPGU(BFS) rIfN 715
CYC2008 0.6164 0.7135 0.6079
SGD 0.5188 0.5270 0.4956
MIPS 0.4376 0.4827 0.4304
DIP-yeast DAPGUWD(DFS) rIfN 1,925
CYC2008 0.3830 0.5486 0.4447
SGD 0.3473 0.4008 0.3620
MIPS 0.2992 0.3475 0.3607
Biogrid-yeast DAPGU(Lex) rIfN 4,991
CYC2008 0.1740 0.5967 0.3845
SGD 0.1671 0.4627 0.3737
MIPS 0.1292 0.3925 0.2994
HPRD DAPGU(BFS) rIfN 2,777
CORUM 0.3685 0.2119 0.2066
PCDq 0.3431 0.2992 0.1681
Biogrid-human DAPGU(DFS) rFfN 7,409
CORUM 0.2527 0.2917 0.2539
PCDq 0.1599 0.3495 0.1272