Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 22;12(9):e0183460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183460

Table 16. Number of predicted complexes with perfect matching with complexes in references (CYC2008 and CORUM) (OS = 1.0).

Small networks
Approach Collins Krogan Core Krogan Extended Gavin
DAPG 51 25 23 28
GMFTP 52 30 22 34
ClusterONE 42 23 19 28
MCL 40 17 8 19
CFinder 38 16 11 20
DCAFP 4 4 3 3
RNSC 45 26 15 24
MCODE 24 9 5 10
SPICI 23 12 18 23
COREPEEL 39 26 18 23
DSDCluster 11 17 8 20
larger networks
Approach DIP-yeast Biogrid-yeast HPRD Biogrid-human
DAPG 22 2 39 8
ClusterONE 3 1 8 1
MCL 6 1 7 2
CFinder 13 - 4 -
DCAFP 8 0 2 -
RNSC 0 2 8 1
MCODE 3 0 2 1
SPICI 7 1 1 1
COREPEEL 11 2 46 11
DSDCluster 10 7 10 3