Table 2.

Two syllable combinations were used as audio-visual stimuli, presented by six different talkers.

The stimuli were selected from the OLAVS set (cf. Stropahl et al., 2016). The right column shows the response options presented to the participant as a four-alternative forced choice design (4-AFC).

A – V stimulus	Talker	4-AFC options (A, V, Fusion1, Fusion2)
Ba-Ga	2 females, 1 male	Ba, Ga, Da, Ma
Pa-Da	1 female, 2 males	Pa, Da, Ka, Ta