Table 1. Clinicopathologic features of 14 cases with primary ovarian endometrioid stromal sarcomas.
Case | Age,y | Laterality | Size | Grade | Stage | Treatment | RFS(mo) | Location ofrecurrence | Status(mo) | Status uterus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 40 | Right | 8 | LG | III | TH+BSO, L, A, tumor debulking, RT, HT | – | – | NED(55) | Serosa involved |
2 | 54 | Left | 5 | LG | III | BSO, tumor debulking, RT, CT | 252 | Retroperitoneum | AWD(311) | Myoma |
3 | 40 | Left | 8 | LG | III | TH+BSO, L, A, tumor debulking, CT, HT | – | – | NED(76) | Negative |
4 | 43 | Right | 18 | LG | I | TH+BSO | – | – | NED(140) | Negative |
5 | 34 | Bilateral | 4, 8 | LG | III | TH+BSO, L, tumor debulking, CT | – | – | NED(48) | Negative |
6 | 61 | Right | 14 | LG | I | BSO, A, CT | – | – | NED(54) | Myoma |
7 | 60 | Left | 5 | LG | I | TH+BSO, A, HT | – | – | NED(121) | Negative |
8 | 43 | Right | Unk | LG | I | TH+RSO | 30 | Left ovary, Rectum, | NED(64) | Negative |
9 | 50 | Bilateral | Unk | LG | III | BSO, tumor debulking, CT | 8 | Rectum | NED(66) | Negative |
10 | 59 | Left | Unk | HG | I | TH+BSO, L, A, CT | 22 | Pelvis, rectum | AWD(72) | Negative |
11 | 53 | Right | 15 | HG | III | BSO, tumor debulking, CT | – | – | NED(8) | Myoma |
12 | 61 | Bilateral | Unk | HG | III | TH+BSO, L, A, tumor debulking, CT | 24 | Pelvis, colon | DOD(112) | Negative |
13 | 34 | Right | Unk | HG | I | TH+RSO, A, CT | 12 | Pelvis, sigmoid colon, rectum | DOD(18) | Negative |
14 | 55 | Right | 8 | HG | III | TH+BSO, L, A, tumor debulking, CT | 8 | Pelvis, colon, liver | AWD(17) | Serosa involved |
LG, low-grade; HG, high-grade; TH, total hysterectomy; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; RSO, right salpingo-oophorectomy; L, lymph node dissection; A, appendicectomy; RT, radiotherapy; CT, chemotherapy; HT, hormonal therapy; RFS, recurrence-free survival; NED, no evidence of disease; AWD, Alive with disease; DOD, dead of disease; Unk, unknown.