Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 6;8(38):64407–64416. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19041

Table 4. Meta-regression of potential heterogeneity among the included studies.

Covariates No. of studies Coefficient SE RDOR (95% CI) P value
Country
 USA 9 –0.66 0.77 0.52 (0.10–2.76) 0.41
 others 13
Sample size
 < 100 13 0.87 0.70 2.39 (0.52–10.96) 0.24
 ≥ 100 9
Specimen
 Effusion 4 –1.32 1.78 0.27 (0.01–13.01) 0.47
 Tissue 18
D2-40 dilution
 < 1:50 5 –1.10 0.96 0.33 (0.04–2.72) 0.27
 others 17
Cut-off
 Membranous staining 13 –1.52 0.72 0.22 (0.05–1.04) 0.05
 others 9
Study Design
 Prospective 1 –0.14 1.60 1.15 (0.04–37.21) 0.93
 others 21
Blinding
 Yes 3 −0.97 1.30 0.38(0.02–6.53) 0.47
 NA 19
QUADAS score
 < 9 2 1.08 2.10 2.95 (0.03–289.83) 0.62
 ≥ 9 20

SE: Standard error; RDOR: Relative diagnostic odds ratio; CI: Confidential interval; NA: Not available; QUADAS: Quality assessment for diagnostic accuracy studies.