Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;147(10):1977–1985. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.256669

TABLE 3.

Sex-specific associations of dietary patterns with adiposity among 224 Mexican adolescents1

Associations of each dietary pattern factor score with adiposity indicators
BMI z score Waist circumference, cm SS + TR, mm SS:TR
Boys (n = 108)
 Factor 1: prudent dietary pattern
  Model 1 −0.18 (−0.45, 0.08) −1.32 (−3.43, 0.79) −1.67 (−4.08, 0.72) −0.05 (−0.09, 0.00)
  Model 2 −0.18 (−0.45, 0.09) −1.27 (−3.36, 0.81) −1.65 (−4.05, 0.74) −0.05 (−0.09, 0.00)
  Model 3 −0.17 (−0.44, 0.09) −1.22 (−3.32, 0.89) −1.54 (−3.96, 0.88) −0.04 (−0.09, 0.00)
 Factor 2: transitioning dietary pattern
  Model 1 −0.11 (−0.33, 0.11) −0.98 (−2.73, 0.76) −1.13 (−3.11, 0.85) 0.00 (−0.04, 0.04)
  Model 2 −0.11 (−0.34, 0.11) −0.76 (−2.50, 0.99) −1.02 (−3.03, 0.98) 0.00 (−0.04, 0.04)
  Model 3 −0.11 (−0.34, 0.11) −0.73 (−2.50, 1.04) −1.01 (−3.05, 1.02) 0.00 (−0.04, 0.04)
Girls (n = 116)
 Factor 1: prudent dietary pattern
  Model 1 0.05 (−0.17, 0.27) 0.52 (−1.35, 2.39) 0.08 (−1.99, 2.15) −0.03 (−0.07, 0.01)
  Model 2 0.05 (−0.17, 0.27) 0.51 (−1.35, 2.38) 0.07 (−1.99, 2.14) −0.03 (−0.07, 0.01)
  Model 3 0.04 (−0.18, 0.26) 0.47 (−1.39, 2.32) 0.04 (−2.02, 2.10) −0.03 (−0.07, 0.01)
 Factor 2: transitioning dietary pattern
  Model 1 0.21 (−0.05, 0.46) 1.54 (−0.59, 3.66) 2.29 (−0.05, 4.63) 0.00 (−0.05, 0.04)
  Model 2 0.21 (−0.05, 0.46) 1.65 (−0.49, 3.80) 2.46 (0.10, 4.81)* −0.01 (−0.05, 0.04)
  Model 3 0.20 (−0.06, 0.45) 1.55 (−0.59, 3.69) 2.38 (0.03, 4.74)* −0.01 (−0.05, 0.04)
1

Values are βs (95% CIs) for each outcome per 1-unit increase in the dietary pattern factor score. Model 1 adjusted for mother’s marital status, education, and smoking habits during pregnancy and for child’s age; model 2 adjusted as for model 1 and for child’s physical activity (hours per week); model 3 adjusted as for model 2 and for child’s pubertal status (prepubertal vs. pubertal). *P < 0.05. SS, subscapular skinfold thickness; TR, triceps skinfold thickness.