Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;147(10):1977–1985. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.256669

TABLE 5.

Sex-specific associations of dietary patterns with lipid profile among 224 Mexican adolescents1

Associations of each dietary pattern factor score with serum lipid concentrations, mg/dL
Total cholesterol TGs LDL cholesterol HDL cholesterol
Boys (n = 108)
 Factor 1: prudent dietary pattern
  Model 1 −1.61 (−7.83, 4.61) 3.50 (−4.89, 11.90) −3.77 (−8.77, 1.22) 1.45 (−0.99, 3.91)
  Model 2 −1.58 (−7.80, 4.64) 3.60 (−4.77, 11.97) −3.72 (−8.72, 1.26) 1.43 (−1.01, 3.87)
  Model 3 −1.88 (−8.05, 4.29) 4.01 (−4.51, 12.52) −3.80 (−8.75, 1.15) 1.12 (−1.29, 3.53)
 Factor 2: transitioning dietary pattern
  Model 1 −2.74 (−7.85, 2.36) −5.65 (−12.50, 1.21) −0.75 (−4.91, 3.40) −0.86 (−2.88, 1.16)
  Model 2 −2.63 (−7.81, 2.55) −5.32 (−12.26, 1.63) −0.53 (−4.74, 3.68) −1.03 (−3.08, 1.00)
  Model 3 −3.53 (−8.66, 1.61) −5.06 (−12.16, 2.03) −1.07 (−5.26, 3.12) −1.44 (−3.45, 0.56)
Girls (n = 116)
 Factor 1: prudent dietary pattern
  Model 1 0.26 (−4.19, 4.70) 1.63 (−6.58, 9.84) −0.35 (−3.91, 3.20) 0.28 (−1.69, 2.26)
  Model 2 0.27 (−4.18, 4.71) 1.67 (−6.52, 9.86) −0.35 (−3.91, 3.20) 0.29 (−1.69, 2.26)
  Model 3 0.37 (−4.09, 4.83) 1.63 (−6.52, 9.79) −0.29 (−3.86, 3.28) 0.33 (−1.65, 2.31)
 Factor 2: transitioning dietary pattern
  Model 1 −3.91 (−8.94, 1.13) −1.18 (−10.57, 8.21) −2.18 (−6.23, 1.87) −1.50 (−3.74, 0.75)
  Model 2 −4.19 (−9.27, 0.89) −1.78 (−11.25, 7.69) −2.20 (−6.30, 1.89) −1.63 (−3.90, 0.63)
  Model 3 −4.04 (−9.15, 1.07) −2.09 (−11.53, 7.36) −2.07 (−6.19, 2.04) −1.55 (−3.82, 0.72)
1

Values are βs (95% CIs) for each outcome per 1-unit increase in the dietary pattern factor score. Model 1 adjusted for mother’s marital status, education, and smoking habits during pregnancy and for child's age; model 2 adjusted as for model 1 and for child’s physical activity (hours per week); model 3 adjusted as for model 2 and for child’s pubertal status (prepubertal vs. pubertal).