Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ment Retard. 2008 May;113(3):214–230. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[214:SNOLAC]2.0.CO;2

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics by Diagnostic Group

Characteristic Groupa

DS (n = 22) FX (n = 18) TD (n = 17)



Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
CA (in years) 17.59** 3.68 17.58** 3.35 4.54 .58
S-Bb Nonverbal MA (in years) 5.22 1.06 5.03 1.52 4.50 .70
S-Bb Nonverbal IQ 42.32** 6.38 42.56** 8.42 98.00 6.90
OESc age-equivalent (in years) 4.60* 1.78 8.09 4.34 5.62* .89
TACL–3d age-equivalent (in years) 5.62* 1.47 6.83 1.69 5.95 1.06
Proportion correct false belief .29 .28 .47 .35 .50 .39
No. correct digit sequencese 3.14 2.42 3.33 2.03 4.35 1.93
Child Behavior Checklist Total T scoref 55.09 8.29 57.06 9.67
No. Caucasians 22 16 14
No. mothers with college degreeg 15 13 15
No. males 12 13 8
a

DS = Down syndrome, FX = fragile X syndrome, TD = typically developing.

b

Based on administration of the Pattern Analysis, Copying, and Bead Memory subtests of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th ed.

c

Oral Expression Scale of the Oral and Written Language Scales. Age-equivalents are missing for 1 participant with DS and 2 TD participants.

d

Test of Auditory Comprehension of Language–3.

e

Based on the forward recall portion of the Digit Span subtest of the Wechsler Scales of Intelligence for Children, 3rd edition.

f

Child Behavior Checklist/4–18.

g

Level of maternal education was not available for 1 participant with FX.

*

Significantly different, p < .05, from FX.

**

Significantly different, p <.05, from TD.