Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 5;113(5):1002–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.067

Table 1.

Comparison of Important Secondary Structures Present in the Aβ42 and MTSL-Cys-Aβ42 Ensemble

Sequence Region Secondary Structure % Aβ42 MTSL-Cys-Aβ42
Localized secondary structure (helices and turns) for N-terminal residues 1–15 turn 1–2/turn 2–3 4.4 ± 1.5 23.3 ± 2.3
turn 3–4/turn 5–6 7.6 ± 5.3 10.0 ± 5.0
turn 7–8/turn 8–9 36.0 ± 17.4 32.6 ± 25.0
turn 9–10/turn 10–11 14.4 ± 4.7 15.6 ± 0.2
turn 11–12 7.4 ± 4.0 7.4 ± 1.1
turn 12–13/turn 13–14 12.2 ± 1.2 12.6 ± 4.7
turn/helix 14–15 24.4 ± 11.4 9.3 ± 3.4
turn 17–18 3.6 ± 0.6 12.8 ± 13.8
turn 21–22/turn 22–23 5.0 ± 2.7 11.6 ± 2.5
Localized secondary structure (helices and turns) for central residues 16–30 turn 23–24/turn 24–25 10.7 ± 2.0 22.8 ± 9.5
turn/helix 25–26 21.0 ± 4.4 21.2 ± 15.7
turn/helix 26–27 22.8 ± 4.7 12.8 ± 4.4
turn 29–30 10.8 ± 5.0 4.6 ± 2.4
Localized secondary structure (helices and turns) for C-terminal residues 31–42 turn 30–31/turn 31–32 15.8 ± 1.6 3.8 ± 0.2
turn 32–33 7.3 ± 1.3 45.6 ± 1.6
turn 33–34 9.3 ± 1.8 3.2 ± 2.2
helix 32–33/helix 33–34 6.8 ± 1.1 12.3 ± 8.1
helix 34–35 6.4 ± 1.9 8.4 ± 0.8
helix 35–36 3.2 ± 1.1 6.1 ± 0.6
turn 36–37 6.6 ± 0.5 5.2 ± 0.1
Residues involved in β-strand pairings turn 37–38 6.6 ± 1.9 9.3 ± 6.7
β-strands 3–6 and 31–41 0.5 ± 0.7 6.6 ± 8.6
β-strands 16–21 and 29–36 8.7 ± 6.6 17.8 ± 13.8
β-strands 27–31 and 33–38 5.0 ± 4.3 38.0 ± 6.9
β-strands 34–36 and 39–40 2.2 ± 1.5 5.4 ± 6.8

The asterisks indicate the structural features whose populations differ in the untagged and tagged ensembles by a larger standard deviation than that observed for REMD and TCW ensembles of the Aβ42 ensemble.