Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 16;106(4):1142–1156. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.156349

TABLE 6.

Pooled effect size for the association between rs1801198 and primary risk of congenital abnormalities

Congenital abnormality Cases, n Controls, n OR (95% CI)1 P1 I2 (95% CI),2 % P3
CC/CG + GG
 Spontaneous abortion and female infertility 148/640 400/1322 0.700 (0.433, 1.131) 0.15 69.58 (12.40, 89.44) 0.02
 Neural tube defects 134/739 211/1157 0.894 (0.694, 1.152) 0.39 0.00 (0.00, 63.65) 0.71
 Cleft lip 300/1006 343/1190 1.112 (0.863, 1.433) 0.41 42.63 (0.00, 82.70) 0.16
 Down syndrome 134/362 190/516 1.030 (0.774, 1.370) 0.84 0.00 (0.00, 84.05) 0.49
 Whole analysis4 722/2771 1153/4232 0.951 (0.819, 1.104) 0.51 31.32 (0.00, 61.75) 0.11
GG/CG + CC
 Spontaneous abortion and female infertility 151/640 264/1322 1.241 (0.957, 1.610) 0.10 0.00 (0.00, 36.13) 0.90
 Neural tube defects 274/739 408/1157 1.176 (0.863, 1.602) 0.30 41.92 (0.00, 78.62) 0.14
 Cleft lip 221/1006 267/1190 0.901 (0.624, 1.300) 0.58 62.84 (0.00, 89.38) 0.07
 Down syndrome 65/362 88/516 1.081 (0.607, 1.923) 0.80 59.80 (0.00, 86.59) 0.06
 Whole analysis4 716/2771 1037/4232 1.086 (0.928, 1.272) 0.30 32.90 (0.00, 62.60) 0.09
1

Random-effect model according to the DerSimonian and Laird procedure (22).

2

I2 is the percentage of observed total variation across studies that was due to real heterogeneity rather than to chance (24).

3

Significance for heterogeneity was assessed with the use of the χ2-based Q statistic (24).

4

Study by Mills et al. (52) that assessed the association with the primary risk of omphalocele was included in the whole analysis but not in subgroup analyses because of a lack of other studies on omphalocele.