Table 2.
SUVRCB | SUVRWM | VT | |
Aβ1–42 | [0.788] 0.379 | [0.773] 0.301 | [0.692] 0.287 |
Aβ1–42/Aβ1 - 40 | [0.819] 0.622 | [0.862] 0.641 | [0.724] 0.466 |
Aβ1–42, T-tau | [0.926] 0.622 | [0.903] 0.381 | [0.746] 0.102 |
Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40, T-tau | [0.908] 0.526 | [0.905] 0.584 | [0.726] 0.466 |
Aβ1–42, P-tau181 | [0.902] 0.516 | [0.863] 0.145 | [0.774] 0.186 |
Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40, P-tau181 | [0.894] 0.622 | [0.847] 0.641 | [0.794] 0.466 |
Aβ1–42, T-tau, P-tau181 | [0.950] 0.754 | [0.973] 0.695 | [0.774] 0.186 |
Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40, T-tau, P-tau181 | [0.912] 0.604 | [0.948] 0.656 | [0.810] 0.466 |
Logistic regression models compared the amyloid-PET scans (SUVRCB, SUVRWM, and VT) with either CSF Aβ1–42 or Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40, or these CSF biomarkers in combination with T-tau and/or P-tau181. [AUC] and Cohen’s κ coefficients. If T-tau or P-tau were included with CSF Aβ1–42 and Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40 in the model, a higher concordance was detected when the CSF Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40 ratio was applied compared to CSF Aβ1–42 alone (for VT and both SUVR measures). Similar findings were detected in case both CSF tau concentrations were added to Aβ1–42 alone or Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40 in the logistic regression models. AUC, area under the curve; CB, cerebellar grey matter; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio; VT, total volume of distribution; WM, whole subcortical white matter.