Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 May 1;13(6):2930–2944. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01183

Table 1.

Comparing AlGDock and YANK binding free energy estimates. The AlGDock free energies were calculated using different weighting schemes. RMSE is in units of kcal/mol.

Full (24) Active (11) Inactive (13)

Weighting Scheme Linear Regression RMSE R RMSE R RMSE R

a y=1.10x+0.77 1.48(0.23) 0.91(0.02) 1.13(0.20) 0.79(0.04) 1.72(0.33) 0.93(0.03)
b y=1.14x+0.62 1.57(0.27) 0.91(0.02) 1.23(0.18) 0.75(0.05) 1.81(0.45) 0.93(0.04)
c y=1.13x+0.56 1.59(0.23) 0.90(0.02) 0.77(0.08) 0.90(0.03) 2.04(0.36) 0.91(0.03)
d y=1.17x+0.38 1.76(0.27) 0.90(0.02) 0.98(0.16) 0.87(0.04) 2.22(0.44) 0.91(0.03)
e y=1.18x+0.82 1.53(0.24) 0.92(0.02) 0.93(0.31) 0.90(0.02) 1.90(0.29) 0.92(0.03)
f y=1.18x+0.66 1.49(0.21) 0.92(0.02) 0.94(0.36) 0.93(0.01) 1.83(0.27) 0.92(0.03)
c1 y=1.09x+0.52 1.75(0.26) 0.87(0.02) 0.89(0.10) 0.87(0.03) 2.23(0.39) 0.87(0.03)
1

Using only snapshots from YANK calculations with active ligands.