Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 May 1;13(6):2930–2944. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01183

Table 3. Comparing different free energy estimates with experiment.

AlGDock calculations were based on 384 snapshots from simulations with active ligands, weighted according to scheme (c). As DOCK 6 does not have an implicit solvent, OBC2 and PBSA describe the receptor potential energies used for snapshot weights. The outlier iodobenzene is excluded from this analysis. For the same table including the outlier, see Table S7 of the SI.

Method Implicit solvent Spearman ρ Kendall τ Pearson R RMSE
DOCK 6 OBC2 0.36(0.00) 0.24(0.01) 0.45(0.04) 12.06(0.37)
DOCK 6 PBSA 0.44(0.00) 0.33(0.01) 0.50(0.04) 12.62(0.36)
min Ψ OBC2 0.39(0.01) 0.27(0.02) 0.55(0.04) 15.46(0.57)
min Ψ PBSA 0.45(0.01) 0.35(0.01) 0.56(0.03) 14.03(0.59)
mean Ψ OBC2 0.39(0.01) 0.29(0.01) 0.51(0.04) 9.64(0.47)
mean Ψ PBSA 0.56(0.00) 0.44(0.01) 0.60(0.05) 7.50(0.38)
MBAR-based OBC2 0.34(0.01) 0.23(0.02) 0.44(0.06) 1.60(0.17)
MBAR-based PBSA 0.62(0.01) 0.48(0.01) 0.65(0.05) 2.81(0.32)