Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;2017:7064120. doi: 10.1155/2017/7064120

Table 5.

Differentiation of pseudoprogression from true progression.

Study (year) (ref) Group (n) Average age (year) Imaging modality (method or model; parameter analysis) Indexes Threshold (Sp%, Sn%) limitations
Mangla et al. (2010) [150] PsP (7) 
TP (12)
61 DSC-MRI (algorithm for leakage effect correction; ROI-based analysis) rCBV Percentage change in rCBV for discrimination of PsP and TP (85.7%, 76.9%) Retrospective; different treatment management; small sample size

Martínez-Martínez and Martínez-Bosch (2014) [151] PsP (17) 
TP (7)
48 DSR-MRI (leakage effect uncorrected; ROI-based analysis) rCBV  
rPSR 
rPH
rPH = 1.37 (82.2%, 88%) 
rCBV = 0.9 (100%, 100%) 
rPSR = 99% (70.6%, 100%)
Retrospective; small sample size; impact of corticoid therapy on parameter evaluation; lack of histological confirmation

Prager et al. (2015) [152] PsP (8) 
TP (43)
55 DSC-MRI (γ-variate function for leakage correction; ROI-based analysis) rCBVlesion
rCBVROI
rCBVlesion = 1.07 (75%, 100%) 
rCBVROI = 1.74 (75%, 92.9%)
Retrospective; small sample size of PsP; MGMT in some patients may affect the perfusion parameters

Baek et al. (2012) [153] PsP (37) 
TP (42)
49 DSC-MRI (γ-variate function for leakage correction; histogram analysis) nCBV Percent change of skewness: 1.27% (79.2%, 85.7%) 
Percent change of kurtosis: 14% (73.0%, 61.9%)
Different therapies in patients; results were obtained from only one observer

Tsien et al. (2010) [154] PsP (13) 
TP (14)
52 DSC-MRI (leakage effect uncorrected, parametric response map) rCBV  
rCBF
Not provided; patients with progressive had reduced rCBV Leakage effect may underestimate rCBV value

Gahramanov et al. (2013) [155] PsP (9) 
TP (10)
N/A DSC-MRI (ferumoxytol for leakage correction) rCBV rCBV = 1.5 (Sp%, Sn% not provided) Lack of histopathologic confirmation; small sample size

Suh et al. (2013) [156] PsP (36) 
TP (43)
50 DCE-MRI (nonmodel fitting; histogram analysis) AUCR  
mAUCRH
mAUCRH = 0.31 (82.9%, 90.1%) 
AUC50 = 0.19 (83.1%, 87.2%)
Lack of correlation between imaging measurements and specimen histology

Yun et al. (2015) [157] PsP (16) 
TP (17)
55 DCE-MRI (ETK model; histogram analysis) K trans  
Ve
Vp
K trans = 0.347 (94%, 59%) 
Ve = 0.570 (56%, 88%) 
No significant difference of Vp between PsP and TP group
Small relative sample size; lack of histological confirmation