Table 3.
Ref. | Treatment modality | Tumor type | DW-MR parameter evaluated | Study results/teaching point |
Chapiro et al[79] | TACE | HCC | (3D) quantitative enhancement-based and DW volumetric MR | High accuracy and intermethod agreement of 3D quantitative techniques in the assessment of tumor necrosis after TACE is clinically relevant |
High diagnostic performance of qEASL criteria and qADC may help in triaging patients for repeat treatment after a TACE session | ||||
Mannelli et al[87] | TACE | HCC | ADC measured with DWI in treatment response | Pre TACE ADC obtained at 0, 50, 500 s/mm2 b values before and after treatment may be used to predict HCC response to TACE |
Park et al[42] | Radiotherapy | HCC | DW MR vs conventional MR for treatment response | Improved detection of viable tumor when DW MR is added to conventional sequences |
Yu et al[76] | Radiation therapy | HCC | DW MR | Change in ADC value before and after RT is related to local progression free survival. Hence ADC value and RECIST may substitute for mRECIST in patients who cannot receive contrast agents |
Schraml et al[77] | Radiofrequency | n = 16 HCC, 1 = cholangiocarcinoma, and 37 = metastases (28 colorectal cancer, 3 melanoma, 3 breast cancer, 1 pancreatic cancer, 1 gastric cancer, esophageal cancer) | DW MR and mean ADC values | ADC-based evaluation of signal alterations adjacent to the ablation zone may contribute to the identification of local tumor progression and nontumoral post- treatment tissue changes |
Ablation |
HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; DW MR: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance; TACE: Trans-arterial chemoembolization.