TABLE 2.
a) | |||
Subject | Electrode effect | Masker effect | Interaction |
AB 1a | F(4,45) = 109.9, p < 0.001 | F(2,45) = 3.2, p = 0.05 | F(8,45) = 3.5, p < 0.01 |
AB 102 | F(4,60) = 11.3, p < 0.001 | F(2,60) = 0.2, n.s. | F(8,60) = 2.8, p < 0.05 |
AB 103 | F(4,45) = 234.4, p < 0.001 | F(2,45) = 25.5, p < 0.001 | F(8,45) = 43.4, p < 0.001 |
AB 104 | F(4,60) = 99.9, p < 0.001 | F(2,60) = 9.9, p < 0.001 | F(8,60) = 14.6, p < 0.001 |
AB 105 | F(4,60) = 35.0, p < 0.001 | F(2,60) = 3.1, n.s. | F(8,60) = 2.3, p < 0.05 |
AB 106 | F(4,60) = 39.2, p < 0.001 | F(2,60) = 7.0, p < 0.01 | F(8,60) = 6.7, p < 0.001 |
AB 107 | F(4,69) = 37.4, p < 0.001 | F(2,69) = 37.4, p < 0.001 | F(8,69) = 10.6, p < 0.001 |
b) | |||
Subject | Electrode effect | Masker effect | Interaction |
AB 1a | F(4,30) = 73.6, p < 0.001 | F(1,30) = 5.4, p < 0.05 | F(4,30) = 6.7, p = 0.001 |
AB 102 | F(4,40) = 7.4, p < 0.001 | F(1,40) = 0.4, n.s. | F(4,40) = 4.7, p = 0.003 |
AB 103 | F(4,30) = 87.9, p < 0.001 | F(1,30) = 6.2, p < 0.05 | F(4,30) = 28.6, p < 0.001 |
AB 104 | F(4,40) = 60.4, p < 0.001 | F(1,40) = 11.4, p < 0.05 | F(4,30) = 26.8, p < 0.001 |
AB 105 | F(4,40) = 18.2, p < 0.001 | F(1,40) = 3.9, n.s. | F(4,30) = 3.1, p < 0.05 |
AB 106 | F(4,40) = 25.8, p < 0.001 | F(1,40) = 1.8, n.s. | F(4,40) = 2.3, n.s. |
AB 107 | F(4,46) = 24.2, p < 0.001 | F(1,46) = 24.1, p < 0.001 | F(4,46) = 16.6, p < 0.001 |
c) | |||
Subject | Electrode effect | (-2,0) vs (-1,1) | (0,2) vs (-1,1) |
AB 1a | F(4,15) = 98.6, p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
AB 102 | F(4,20) = 4.4, p = 0.01 | p < 0.05 | p < 0.05 |
AB 103 | F(4,15) = 403.6, p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p = 0.001 |
AB 104 | F(4,20) = 41.6, p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | n.s. |
AB 105 | F(4,20) = 32.3, p < 0.001 | p = 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
AB 106 | F(4,20) = 42.3, p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
AB 107 | F(4,23) = 18.6, p < 0.001 | n.s. | n.s. |
aA slightly different method was used for this subject