Table 1.
Within-run precision, extraction efficiency and total error in dog VS.
Precision | Extraction efficiency | ± Total error (%) | Total error acceptance criteria (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean concentration (pg/ml) | Within-run precision (%CV) | Precision acceptance criteria (%) | Expected concentration after spiking (pg/ml) | Mean of measured concentration after spiking (pg/ml) | Within-run precision (%CV) | Precision acceptance criteria (%) | % Spiking recovery | ± Relative error (%) | |||
VS1 | 17.6 | 18.1 | ≤25 | 67.6 | 54.9 | 3.6 | ≤20 | 81 | 19 | 22.6 | ≤30 |
VS2 | 22.2 | 0.8 | ≤25 | 55.5 | 70.1 | 2.5 | ≤20 | 126 | 26 | 28.5 | ≤30 |
VS3 | 48.6 | 2.2 | ≤25 | 90.1 | 72.4 | 4.9 | ≤20 | 80 | 20 | 24.9 | ≤30 |
Acceptance criteria in this species were as follows: the absolute mean bias % relative error (RE) and the %CV should be ≤ 20% of the nominal value at each concentration level (≤25% at the interval between 1x and 3xLLOQ, i.e., 16.4–49.2 pg/ml). The total error should not exceed 30% (40% at the interval around the LLOQ). Values out of the acceptance range are indicated in bold.