Table 2.
Within-run precision, extraction efficiency and total error in cat VS.
Precision | Extraction efficiency | ± Total error (%) | Total error acceptance criteria (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean concentration (pg/ml) | Within-run precision (%CV) | Precision acceptance criteria (%) | Expected concentration after spiking (pg/ml) | Mean of measured concentration after spiking (pg/ml) | Within-run precision (%CV) | Precision acceptance criteria (%) | % Spiking recovery | ± Relative error (%) | |||
VS1 | 21.8 | 18.5 | ≤25 | 41.8 | 47.8 | 10.5 | ≤20 | 114 | 14 | 24.5 | ≤40 |
VS2 | 26.4 | 11.4 | ≤25 | 45.6 | 34.9 | 1.2 | ≤25 | 77 | 23 | 24.2 | ≤40 |
VS3 | 112.2 | 9.0 | ≤20 | 145.2 | 141.1 | 5.8 | ≤20 | 97 | 3 | 8.8 | ≤30 |
Acceptance criteria in this species were as follows: the absolute mean bias % relative error (RE) and the %CV should be ≤ 20% of the nominal value at each concentration level (≤25% at the interval between 1x and 3xLLOQ, i.e., 16.7–50.1 pg/ml). The total error should not exceed 30% (40% at the interval around the LLOQ).