Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2017 Jul 14;76:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.013

Table 2. Sample characteristics by nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NPS) during the past six months.

Total (N=6962) No NPS (n=6180) NPS (n=782)
Race
 % (n) White 62.1 (4320) 60.4 (3734) 74.9 (586)
 % (n) Asian 19.5 (1358) 20.6 (1275) 10.6 (83)
 % (n) Black or African-American 9.9 (692) 10.4 (645) 6.0 (47)
 % (n) Multiple or other races 8.5 (592) 8.5 (526) 8.4 (66)
Gender: % (n) Male 40.9 (2844) 39.7 (2455) 49.7 (389)
Ethnicity: % (n) Hispanic or Latino/a 9.3 (644) 9.1 (560) 10.7 (84)
Perceived academic benefit of NPS
 % (n) Strongly disagree 13.6 (948) 15.0 (929) 2.4 (19)
 % (n) Disagree 19.7 (1372) 21.3 (1319) 6.8 (53)
 % (n) Unsure 38.0 (2648) 39.6 (2446) 25.8 (202)
 % (n) Agree 23.3 (1623) 20.6 (1271) 45.0 (352)
 % (n) Strongly agree 5.3 (371) 3.5 (215) 19.9 (156)
Mean (SD) perceived academic benefit score 2.9 (1.1) 2.8 (1.1) 3.7 (0.9)
Mean (SD) total drinks per week 6.9 (8.3) 5.9 (7.4) 15.0 (10.4)
Mean (SD) days used marijuana during the past six months 10.8 (32.3) 6.8 (24.8) 42.9 (56.8)

Note. Perceived academic benefit of NPS was scored 1 (strongly disagree) through 5 (strongly agree).