Table 1.
Mean (SD) parameter estimates for each pathway type included in the individual structural equation model for each participant at each time and mean percentage of participants for whom the paths were significant. Aside from auto-regressive terms, contemporaneous paths accounted for the most variance in the model as indicated by higher parameter estimates compared to other pathway types. Additionally, contemporaneous pathways were the path type most likely to be significant in individual participant models, aside from auto-regressive terms.
| Time 1 | Time 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Pathway Type | Parameter Estimate | Percent Significant |
Parameter Estimate | Percent Significant |
|
|
||||
| Auto-regressive | 0.39 (0.18) | 92.8 | 0.40 (0.17) | 94.5 |
|
|
||||
| Contemporaneous | 0.25 (0.17) | 77.6 | 0.20 (0.19) | 73.2 |
|
|
||||
| Lagged | −0.03 (0.13) | 29.7 | −0.04 (0.11) | 26.7 |
|
|
||||
| Bilinear Interaction | −0.01 (0.08) | 7.1 | −0.01 (0.12) | 13.9 |
|
|
||||
| Input | 0.08 (0.11) | 13.6 | 0.07 (0.11) | 12.7 |
|
|
||||
| Lagged Input | −0.01 (0.10) | 27.5 | 0.00 (0.10) | 23.1 |