Skip to main content
. 2017 May;27(3):273–282. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v27i3.9

Table 2.

Distribution of the study population by medical history variables in relation to the presence of MetS or its absence.

Medical history Metabolic syndrome Total P

Presence Absence

No. % No. % No. %
Diabetic duration Less than five 72 22.8 244 77.2 316 100
Five to ten 274 63.1 160 36.9 434 100 .001
More than ten 402 89.3 48 10.7 450 100
BMI category Under weight 0 0.0 7 100.0 7 100
Healthy weight 36 13.8 225 86.2 261 100
Over weight 186 50.8 180 49.2 366 100 .001
Obesity 526 92.9 40 7.1 566 100
Family history of diabetes Yes 640 62.7 380 37.3 1020 100
No 108 60.0 72 40.0 180 100 .483
Received DM care Yes 278 48.4 296 51.6 574 100
instructions No 470 75.1 156 24.9 626 100 .001
Use DM medications Yes 748 62.3 452 37.7 1200 100 -
Type of diabetes Diabetes pills 243 49.5 248 50.5 491 100
medications used Insulin injections 431 68.6 197 31.4 628 100 .001
Pills & injections 74 91.4 7 8.6 81 100
Smoking Yes 89 54.9 73 45.1 162 100
No 659 63.5 379 36.5 1038 100 .001
Consume alcohol No 748 62.3 452 37.7 1200 100 -
Females menopausal status Premenopausal 40 18.6 175 81.4 215 100
Postmenopausal 450 89.5 53 10.5 503 100 .001
Male 258 53.5 224 46.5 482 100

Descriptive statistics, Crosstabs, the chi-square test was used to examine difference in the prevalence of different categorical variable. P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.