Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 22;10(3):123–129. doi: 10.14802/jmd.17048

Table 2.

Comparison of Parkinson’s disease patients without and with EDS

Variables Without EDS (n = 288) With EDS (n = 125) p value
Age, years 65.7 ± 8.9 64.1 ± 9.1 0.1167
Men, n (%) 147 (51.0) 80 (64.0) 0.0150
HY stage* 2.2 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.8 0.1935
UPDRS II 7.6 ± 5.2 11.0 ± 6.6 < 0.0001
UPDRS III 18.9 ± 10.4 21.9 ± 11.2 0.0080
Motor fluctuation, n (%) 60 (20.8) 48 (38.4) 0.0002
Dyskinesia, n (%) 90 (31.3) 53 (42.4) 0.0287
ESS 5.5 ± 2.8 15.1 ± 3.7 < 0.0001
GDS-30§ 11.1 ± 7.0 13.7 ± 7.8 0.0020
Lateralityǁ, n (%) 0.0024
 Right 106 (37.1) 47 (38.5)
 Left 77 (26.9) 50 (41.0)
 Symmetric 103 (36.0) 25 (20.5)
Total LEDD 829.2 ± 378.7 853.3 ± 390.7 0.4060
Levodopa 481.2 ± 254.6 504.0 ± 276.5 0.4150
Ropinirole 8.2 ± 5.7 8.9 ± 4.9 0.2240
*

data missing from two patients (one patient without EDS, the other with EDS),

data missing from seven patients (six without EDS, the other with EDS),

data missing from one in patients without EDS,

§

data missing from six patients (three without EDS, the other with EDS),

ǁ

data missing from five patients (two without EDS, the other with EDS),

the mean value of ropinirole is presented as LEDD.

EDS: excessive daytime sleepiness, HY stage: Hoehn and Yahr stage, UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, ESS: Epworth Sleepiness Scale, GDS-30: 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale, LEDD: levodopa equivalent daily dose.