Table 3.
Direct and indirect effects of environmental exposures on change in HbA1c 1.
Assessed Association | Estimate | 95% CI | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Walkability Models (n = 2260) AIC 9646.34; BICadj 9722.72 | |||
Walkability predicting ∆HbA1c | −0.008 | −0.011 to −0.005 | 0.000 |
Individual PA predicting ∆HbA1c: | |||
1. Low (reference = sedentary) | −0.009 | −0.018 to 0.000 | 0.052 |
2. Meets recommendations (reference = sedentary) | −0.014 | −0.021 to −0.006 | 0.001 |
Walkability predicting individual PA: | |||
1. Low (reference = sedentary) | −0.009 | −0.030 to 0.011 | 0.347 |
2. Meets recommendations (reference = sedentary) | 0.035 | 0.010 to 0.061 | 0.007 |
Indirect effect (×100): through low PA | 0.008 | −0.012 to 0.029 | 0.427 |
Indirect effect (×100): through meets PA recommendations | −0.048 | −0.091 to −0.005 | 0.029 |
Total indirect effect (×100) | −0.040 | −0.079 to 0.001 | 0.045 |
Total effect of walkability on ∆HbA1c (×100) | −0.847 | −1.157 to −0.536 | 0.000 |
Physical Inactivity Norm Models (n = 1926) AIC 8259.17; BICadj 8330.75 | |||
Physical inactivity norm predicting ∆HbA1c | 0.006 | 0.001 to 0.011 | 0.015 |
Individual PA predicting ∆HbA1c: | |||
1. Low (reference = sedentary) | −0.011 | −0.020 to −0.001 | 0.039 |
2. Meets recommendations (reference = sedentary) | −0.016 | −0.024 to −0.007 | 0.000 |
Physical inactivity norm predicting individual PA: | |||
1. Low (reference = sedentary) | −0.008 | −0.032 to 0.015 | 0.490 |
2. Meets recommendations (reference = sedentary) | −0.039 | −0.068 to −0.010 | 0.008 |
Indirect effect (×100): through low PA | 0.009 | −0.016 to 0.034 | 0.496 |
Indirect effect (×100): through meets PA recommendations | 0.061 | 0.000 to 0.122 | 0.049 |
Total indirect effect (×100) | 0.070 | 0.011 to 0.129 | 0.019 |
Total effect of physical inactivity norm on ∆HbA1c (×100) | 0.691 | 0.202 to 1.181 | 0.006 |
Overweight/Obesity Norm Models (n = 1907) AIC 8151.86; BICadj 8222.87 | |||
Overweight/obesity norm predicting ∆HbA1c | 0.006 | 0.002 to 0.010 | 0.006 |
Individual PA predicting ∆HbA1c: | |||
1. Low (reference = sedentary) | −0.011 | −0.021 to −0.001 | 0.028 |
2. Meets recommendations (reference = sedentary) | −0.015 | −0.023 to −0.006 | 0.001 |
Overweight/obesity norm predicting individual PA: | |||
1. Low (reference = sedentary) | 0.015 | −0.009 to 0.039 | 0.219 |
2. Meets recommendations (reference = sedentary) | −0.059 | −0.086 to −0.032 | 0.000 |
Indirect effect (×100): through low PA | −0.016 | −0.048 to 0.016 | 0.313 |
Indirect effect (×100): through meets PA recommendations | 0.085 | 0.019 to 0.151 | 0.011 |
Total indirect effect (×100) | 0.069 | 0.013 to 0.125 | 0.016 |
Total effect of overweight/obesity norm on ∆HbA1c (×100) | 0.642 | 0.239 to 1.046 | 0.002 |
1: Models adjusted for individual-level age, sex, employment status (full-time, part-time, or not in the work force), level of education (university graduate or not), marital status (married/de facto, or single), and smoking status (current smoker, ex-smoker, or never smoked), and area-level income (median household income). AIC: Akaike’s Information Criterion; BICadj: Sample-size adjusted Bayesian Information Criterion.