Table 2.
The absorbance (450–630 nm) to show cell proliferation in ES-D3 and BALB/3T3 cell lines exposed to sham, 3.9 mT IF–MF or 5-FU.
| Cell line | Conditions | Day |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 5 | 7 | ||
| BALB/3T3 | Sham | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.10 | 0.41 ± 0.28 | 1.23 ± 0.22 |
| 3.9 mT IF–MF | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.15 | 0.40 ± 0.18 | 1.43 ± 0.13 | |
| 5-FU | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.20 | 0.89 ± 0.27 | |
| ES-D3 | Sham | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.23 | 0.81 ± 0.21 | 1.71 ± 0.28 |
| 3.9 mT IF–MF | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.22 | 0.84 ± 0.17 | 1.78 ± 0.08 | |
| 5-FU | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.05* | 0.55 ± 0.35* | |
The value represents the mean ± standard deviation (SD) value calculated from 4 independent exposures resulted from each measurement of 6 wells. The difference from sham exposed group was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (*p < 0.01).