Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Photonics Eng. 2016 Feb 1;1(4):2865. doi: 10.18287/JBPE-2015-1-4-209

Table 1.

Comparison of OCT and IVUS in clinical applications in cardiology.

OCT IVUS
Axial resolution 10 μm 100–200 μm
Penetration depth 1–2 mm More than 5 mm
Vulnerable plaques identification Detect thin fibrous cap Strong. The only clinically available technology to measure fibrous cap thickness Weak
Large lipid or necrotic core Not able to image deeper than 1.5 mm Strong
Contrast of lipid and others Relatively strong Weak
Plaque type classification Calcification Strong Stronger than OCT
Lipid Stronger than IVUS Weak
Fibrosis Stronger than IVUS Weak
Stent Small degrees of in-stent neointima Strong Weak but more clinical evidence reported
Uncovered struts Strong Weak but more clinical evidence reported