Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 13;22(3):400–410.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.08.003

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Phenotypic Differences between Wild-Type, prM100,101, and E315 Viruses

(A) C6/36 cells were infected with a mixture containing WT virus and the prM100,101 (yellow) or E315 (red) mutant viruses. The replication index was measured as the log2 value of relative levels of mutant and WT genomes in the supernatant at 3–5 d.p.i., compared with the corresponding ratios in the input. A negative index indicates that the replicative ability of mutant virus is lower than WT virus.

(B) U937-DC-SIGN cells were mock-infected (mock, blue) or infected with WT (aqua), prM100,101 (yellow), and E315 (red) viruses, fixed, and stained with anti-E (left panel) and anti-NS3 (right panel) antibodies at various time points post infection. All data points for (A and B) represent the average of two independent experiments, mean ± SD.