Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar 22;181:54–65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.041

Table 3.

Impact of the study and follow up on treated clinicians

Dependent Variable: Percentage point increase in protocol adherence above the baseline
Overall primed items non-primed items Overall effect size
(1) (2) (3) (4)

Impact of initial interventions
 Scrutiny 0.045 (0.020)** 0.056 (0.023)** 0.03 (0.014)** 0.045 (0.019)**
 Post-Scrutiny 0.006 (0.022) 0.007 (0.027) 0.022 (0.016) 0.009 (0.022)
Impact of encouragement intervention
 Short-term post enc. 0.051 (0.021)** 0.107 (0.025)*** 0.055 (0.014)*** 0.062 (0.020)***
 Feedback received 0.002 (0.018) 0.013 (0.022) 0.001 (0.013) 0.011 (0.018)
 Medium-term post enc. 0.114 (0.023)*** 0.187 (0.027)*** 0.084 (0.016)*** 0.125 (0.023)***
 Long-term post enc. 0.073 (0.023)*** 0.067 (0.028)** 0.097 (0.016)*** 0.066 (0.023)***
Impact of patient order (testing for detection of research team during data visit)
 patient order by day 0.000 (0.002) 0.006 (0.003)** 0.003 (0.002)* 0.002 (0.002)
 patient order after enc. −0.005 (0.003)* −0.008 (0.003)** −0.005 (0.002)** −0.005 (0.003)*
Clinician effects clinician fixed effects included
Patient effects patient and illness type characteristics included patient chars included
N (patients) 2556 2555 2554 2557

Protocol adherence is the percentage of items required by protocol used, as reported by the patient. Each coefficient is the percentage point increase in adherence from a baseline average of 73%. Sample includes health workers seen in each of both rounds.

The model is a mixed effects regression with health worker fixed effects and facility random effects. Standard errors in parenthesis:

***

indicates

***

p<0.01,

**

p<0.05,

*

p<0.1