Skip to main content
. 2017 May 22;8(37):61305–61317. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18064

Table 5. MDR analysis for the risk of prostate cancer prediction in an Chinese population.

Best interaction models Cross-validation Average
prediction error
P-valuea
rs1468033 100/100 0.4566 0.0001
rs2295080 rs1468033 100/100 0.3451 p < 0.0001
rs17036508 rs2295080 rs1468033 100/100 0.3434 p < 0.0001
age rs17036508 rs2295080 rs1468033 99/100 0.4066 p < 0.0001
age rs17036508 rs2295080 rs1468033 rs7250897 78/100 0.4254 p < 0.0001
BMI smoking_status race rs17036508 rs2295080 rs1468033 45/100 0.4467 p < 0.0001
smoking_status age race rs17036508 rs2295080 rs1468033 rs7250897 61/100 0.4022 p < 0.0001
BMI smoking_status age race rs17036508 rs2295080 rs1468033 rs7250897 100/100 0.5066 p < 0.0001

MDR: multifactor dimensionality reduction.

The best model with maximum cross-validation consistency and minimum prediction error rate was in bold.

aP-value for 1000-fold permutation test.