Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 9;8(37):62666–62680. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16989

Table 9. Comparison of HRs for overall survival associated with conventional treatments (based on prior literature), and with cancer-specific survival associated with marriage (in the present study) in AML patients.

Type of Treatment Study Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Reference HR for Treatment (95% CI) HR for Marriage
in Present Study
Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies [45] Allogeneic HSCT Non-allogeneic HSCT (autologous HSCT or chemotherapy 0.76 (0.61-0.95) 0.802 (0.782-0.822)
Meta-Analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials [46] High doses of daunorubicin Standard doses of daunorubicin or idarubicin 0.88 (0.79-0.99)
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [47] High dose of cytarabine Allogeneic HSCT or autologous HSCT 1.66 (1.30-2.14)
Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Phase III Trials [48] Gemtuzumab ozogamicin included regimens Non Gemtuzumab ozogamicin included regimens 0.93 (0.86-1.00)
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [49] Conventional chemotherapy with Gemtuzumab ozogamicin Conventional chemotherapy alone 0.95 (0.83-1.08)
Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials [50] Idarubicin with cytarabine Daunorubicin with cytarabine  0.88 ( 0.81-0.95)
Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials [51] Autologous HSCT Non- autologous HSCT 1.05 (0.91-1.21)
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [52] Allogeneic HSCT Intensive or less intensive chemotherapy 0.58 (0.51-0.64)
Meta-Analysis of Retrospective Studies [53] Allogeneic HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning Allogeneic HSCT with myeloablative conditioning 0.97 (0.88-1.07)

Abbreviation: HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.