Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Mar 28;139(14):5051–5060. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11323

Table 1.

Thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for engrailed-HD and consensus-HD.

Folding thermodynamics Folding kinetics Binding thermodynamics

ΔG°(H2O)(kcal·mol−1) m-value (kcal·mol−1·M−1) kf,H2O (s−1) mf−1) ku,H2O (s−1) mu−1) n Kd (nM) ΔΗ° (kcal·mol−1) TΔS° (kcal·mol−1)

Engrailed-HD 3.62 ± 0.03 1.39 ±0.01 3.9 × 104 −0.81 67.1 0.17 0.98 ± 0.01 737 ± 38 −9.2 ±0.1 −0.8 ± 0.1
Consensus-HD 8.05 ±0.10 1.45 ± 0.02 1.1 × 10e −0.83 1.4 NAa 1.00 ±0.01 8.1 ±1.6 −16 ±0.2 −5.0 ± 0.3
Consensus-HD (10°C) 8.51 ± 0.27 1.35 ± 0.02 5.50 × 10 −0.90 3.24 0.23 ND ND ND ND

Folding thermodynamic: parameters were obtained by fitting gaunidine-induced denaturation curves. Uncertainies are standard errors on the mean of three titrations. Conditions: 25 mM NaPO4 (pH 7.0), 150 mM NaCI, 20°C

Folding kinetics: Parameters were obtained by fitting equation (2) to the guanidine dependence of the rate constants for the refolding and unfolding 1 phases (Figure 5B, C).

a

For consensus-HD, the mu parameter was fixed to the fitted value for the engrailed-HD (0.17 M−1). Conditions: 25 mM NaPO4, 150 mM NaCI, temperatures as indicated.

Binding thermodynamics: Data were anaylzed using Origin 7.0 software fitting to a single site model. Uncertainies are standard errors on the mean of three independent experiments Conditions: 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 250 mM KCI, 25°C.