Table 3.
Selection of currently available experimental platforms that are used to delineate the role of passive and active cues in the context of optimizing key scaffold properties.
| Key Scaffold Properties | Mechanostimulation | Technique to Study | Variables | Current Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passive | ||||
| fibre diameter, fibre topography | • microgrooves | • groove width (nm–m) • shape |
groove-depth as confounding parameter | |
| • dimension/topography | ||||
| • micropatterning | • pattern size (m) • shape • protein gradients |
range of pattern-size | ||
| fibre stiffness, macroscopic stiffness, scaffold density | • substrate stiffness | • polyacrylamide gels (2D) [119] | • 1 Pa–100 kPa | unable to capture fibrous 3D morphology |
| • hydrogels (3D) [120,121] | • <1 Pa–few kPa • stiffness gradients (2D) • non-linearity |
low stiffness magnitude | ||
| Active | ||||
| anisotropy, geometry | • shear stress | • parallel plates [122] | • shear stress (<1 Pa–few Pa) | pressure as confounding parameter |
| • orbital shaker [122] | • shear stress (<1 Pa–few Pa) | temporal and spatial variations in shear stress | ||
| anisotropy, geometry, macroscopic stiffness | • strain | • motor/pressure driven distensible membrane [122] | • strain (1–20%) | spatial variations in strain |
| anisotropy, geometry, macroscopic stiffness | • shear stress & strain | • mock artery [122] | • shear stress (<1 Pa) • strain (1–10%) |
no independent control of variables |
| • microfluidic device [123,124,125] | • shear stress (<1 Pa–few Pa) • strain (1–10%) |
lack of 3D environment | ||
| Passive and active | ||||
| fibre diameter, anisotropy, pore size | • scaffold + shear stress | • parallel plates in mesofluidic device [126] | • shear stress (<1 Pa–few Pa) • scaffold properties |
pressure as confounding parameter |
| anisotropy, pore size, connectivity, macroscopicstiffness, degradation rate | • scaffold + strain | • motor/pressure driven distensible membrane [99,127] | • strain (1–20%) • scaffold properties |
spatial variations in strain |
| fibre diameter, anisotropy, pore size, connectivity, macroscopic stiffness, degradation rate | • scaffold + shear stress & strain | • perfusion bioreactor [128] | • shear stress (<1 Pa–few Pa) • strain (1–5%) • scaffold properties |
no independent control of active variables |