Table 4.
German Sample | Chinese Sample | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (n = 324) | Males (n = 111) | Females (n = 213) | Total (n = 713) | Males (n = 434) | Females (n = 279) | |
SEEKING | 0.01 | 0.03 | (−)0.00 | 0.03 | 0.05 | −0.01 |
[−0.10; 0.10] | [−0.14; 0.20] | [−0.13; 0.13] | [−0.04; 0.10] | [−0.04; 0.13] | [−0.12; 0.10] | |
FEAR | −0.05 | −0.03 | −0.09 | −0.10 ** | −0.05 | −0.18 ** |
[−0.16; 0.05] | [−0.23; 0.17] | [−0.21; 0.04] | [−0.17; −0.02] | [−0.14; 0.05] | [−0.31; −0.05] | |
CARE | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
[−0.02; 0.18] | [−0.08; 0.32] | [−0.10; 0.16] | [−0.03; 0.11] | [−0.07; 0.12] | [−0.06; 0.18] | |
ANGER | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.03 | −0.06 | −0.05 | −0.08 |
[−0.08; 0.12] | [−0.17; 0.18] | [−0.11; 0.17] | [−0.13; 0.02] | [−0.14; 0.05] | [−0.20; 0.04] | |
PLAY | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.10 ** | 0.13 ** | 0.06 |
[−0.10; 0.11] | [−0.19; 0.20] | [−0.10; 0.14] | [0.03; 0.17] | [0.02; 0.22] | [−0.04; 0.16] | |
SADNESS | −0.01 | (−)0.00 | −0.04 | −0.05 | −0.01 | −0.14 * |
[−0.12; 0.09] | [−0.20; 0.17] | [−0.17; 0.10] | [−0.13; 0.02] | [−0.10; 0.07] | [−0.26; −0.02] | |
Spirituality | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | −0.02 |
[−0.06; 0.15] | [−0.09; 0.29] | [−0.11; 0.13] | [−0.07; 0.07] | [−0.08; 0.10] | [−0.11; 0.08] |
Note. ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05 (two-sided). As the urbanicity index was not normally distributed (in both samples), we also calculated Spearman correlations and checked these for significance. Neither the Spearman correlations, nor the corresponding significances did differ meaningfully from the partial correlations and significances presented in this table. Therefore, we only report statistics from parametric testing in the present results section. The confidence intervals were calculated using a bootstrapping method (1000 samples, Bias corrected and accelerated).