Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;7(3):32. doi: 10.3390/metabo7030032

Table 3.

The performance of MS-based urine tests for the detection of adenomatous polyp on both training set and testing set, along with the performance of three fecal based tests. When picking a threshold on the training set, the performance on the testing set with the same threshold produces similar performance.

Training Set Testing Set
Threshold Criteria Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Urine tests
Sens = 90%
(95% CI *)
90.3%
(84.6–96.0%)
20.9%
(16.7–25.1%)
24.9% 88.0% 92.2%
(84.8–99.5%)
19.2%
(13.3–25.1%)
25.3% 89.2%
Sens = 80%
(95% CI)
79.6%
(71.8–87.4%)
42.1%
(36.9–47.2%)
28.6% 87.7% 82.4%
(71.9–92.8%)
36.0%
(28.9–43.2%)
27.6% 87.3%
Sens = 70%
(95% CI)
69.9%
(61.0–78.8%)
59.0%
(53.9–64.2%)
33.2% 87.1% 66.7%
(53.7–79.6%)
55.2%
(47.8–62.7%)
30.6% 84.8%
Spec = 70%
(95% CI)
59.2%
(49.7–68.7%)
70.1%
(65.3–74.8%)
36.5% 85.5% 56.9%
(43.3–70.5%)
70.9%
(64.1–77.4%)
35.4% 84.7%
Spec = 80%
(95% CI)
46.6%
(37.2–56.2%)
80.0%
(75.8–84.1%)
40.3% 83.7% 49.0%
(35.3–62.7%)
80.8%
(74.9–86.7%)
43.1% 84.2%
Spec = 90%
(95% CI)
31.1%
(22.1–40.0%)
88.1%
(84.8–91.5%)
43.2% 81.4% 43.1%
(29.5–56.7%)
91.3%
(87.1–95.5%)
59.5% 84.4%
Fecal Tests
Guaiac HemII 2.0% 98.8% 33.3% 77.5% 3.8% 99.4% 66.7% 77.1%
Immune ICT 10.9% 97.1% 52.4% 78.7% 17.6% 97.0% 64.3% 79.6%
Immune MagSt 15.8% 95.4% 50.0% 79.5% 21.2% 91.7% 44.0% 79.1%

* CI: confidence intervals. They were estimated based on based on binomial distribution.