Table 2.
Performance evaluation parameters of our proposed model and a previous model.
| Datasets | Our Model | Previous Model [13] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sn | OA | AA | Sn | OA | AA | ||
| IC vs. NIC | IC | 80.2 | 87.8 | 87.8 | 85.9 | 86.6 | 86.6 |
| NIC | 95.3 | 87.3 | |||||
| VGIC vs. LGIC | VGIC | 94.7 | 94.0 | 94.0 | 94.6 | 92.6 | 92.7 |
| LGIC | 93.2 | 90.7 | |||||
| Types of VGIC | K+ | 97.5 | 92.6 | 87.7 | 92.6 | 87.8 | 83.7 |
| Ca2+ | 89.7 | 82.8 | |||||
| Na+ | 75.0 | 75.0 | |||||
| An− | 88.5 | 84.6 | |||||
Sn: sensitivity; AA: average accuracy; OA: overall accuracy; IC: ion channels; NIC: non-ion channels; VGIC: voltage-gated ion channels; LGIC: ligand-gated ion channels.