Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 28;19:74. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0386-y

Table 1.

Characteristics of study subjects

n Age (years) Male
(n)
BMI
(kg/m2)
HR
(bpm)
LVEF
(%)
LV mass index (g/m2) LV Wallmin
(mm)
LV Wallmax
(mm)
Patients with normal CMR 70 48 ± 17 45 24 ± 3 65 ± 13 66 ± 9 56 ± 14 7 ± 1 10 ± 2
Cardiac Amyloidosis (AL) 32 73 ± 11 11 28 ± 5 73 ± 13 55 ± 15a 111 ± 32 12 ± 4 18 ± 3a
Cardiac Amyloidosis (ATTR) 22 75 ± 13 14 26 ± 4 79 ± 19 53 ± 14 120 ± 16 12 ± 3 20 ± 5
Anderson-Fabry diseaseb 21 50 ± 17 20 27 ± 5 62 ± 14 60 ± 15 62 ± 25 8 ± 2 13 ± 5
Aortic Stenosis 24 63 ± 18 19 29 ± 7 73 ± 13 62 ± 13 83 ± 23 9 ± 3 14 ± 3
Atrial Fibrillationb 23 66 ± 11 18 28 ± 4 89 ± 19 50 ± 13a 61 ± 13 7 ± 1 11 ± 2
Chronic CAD 309 62 ± 12 193 28 ± 5 69 ± 14 50 ± 16a 74 ± 23 7 ± 2 12 ± 3
Dilated Cardiomyopathy 151 60 ± 15 98 27 ± 7 72 ± 15 35 ± 14a 81 ± 29 5 ± 2a 8 ± 2
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 185 56 ± 15 138 29 ± 11 68 ± 12 69 ± 12 88 ± 33 9 ± 3 19 ± 4a
Hypertension 59 62 ± 14 42 29 ± 5 68 ± 15 61 ± 16 83 ± 38 9 ± 2 14 ± 3
Cardiac Iron-Overloadb 23 53 ± 21 17 23 ± 9 77 ± 14 65 ± 13 56 ± 27 7 ± 2 14 ± 3
Myocarditis (acute) 146 41 ± 12a 68 27 ± 5 75 ± 13 58 ± 13 69 ± 18 8 ± 2 12 ± 2
Myocarditis (previous) 93 47 ± 17 72 27 ± 4 69 ± 14 61 ± 10 62 ± 17 7 ± 1 11 ± 2
Obesity 38 53 ± 15 22 35 ± 4a 70 ± 14 60 ± 10 60 ± 21 7 ± 1 10 ± 2
Pheochromocytoma 29 50 ± 14 14 25 ± 6 71 ± 29 65 ± 10 57 ± 12 8 ± 1 10 ± 1
Cardiac Sarcoidosis 21 59 ± 9 10 28 ± 6 74 ± 13 60 ± 14 64 ± 20 8 ± 2 13 ± 3
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy 45 64 ± 12 35 25 ± 5 74 ± 18 60 ± 15 58 ± 17 8 ± 1 11 ± 3

All values are n (%) or mean ± SD. ARVC arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, BPM beats per minute, BMI body mass index, CAD coronary artery disease, g gram, HR heart rate, kg kilograms, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LV left ventricular, m metre, mm millimetre, Max maximum, Min minimum

adenotes values significantly different from patients with normal CMR (all p < 0.05)

bindicates material from extended analysis period included to address peer review