Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr-Jun;8(2):112–116. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642014DN82000005

Table 1.

Articles divided by tests, author, population, mean age, diagnosis and main results.

Tests Authors Population (n) Age Mean (SD) Diagnosis (n) Results
CogState Lim et al., 2013 HC: 105aMCI: 48AD: 42 HC: 73.62 (6.86)aMCI: 78.87 (6.92)AD: 79.57 (6.61) HC
aMCI
AD
High test-retest reliability and stability in all groups and adequate to detect AD-related cognitive impairment
Darby et al., 2012 263 older adults 64.6 (7) HC Repetitive assessment indicating a population with risk of decline
Hammers et al., 2012 HC: 22MCI: 16AD: 37DLB: 5FTD: 7 70.5( 8.7) HC, MCI, AD, DLB, FTD Sensitivity, but not specificity, for diagnosing dementia
Hammers et al., 2011 HC: 23 MCI: 20AD: 52DLB: 10FTD: 9 HC: 68.4 (9.5)MCI: 73.5 (5.9)AD: 70.8 (8.7)DLB: 70.4 (8.5)FTD: 64.2 (8.1) HC, MCI, AD, DLB, FTD Sensitive for cognitive impairment in established dementia and minimal practice effects at short test-retest intervals
CNS Vital Signs Gualtieri and Johnson, 2006 1069 7-90 HC, neuropsychiatric patients, MCI and dementia Psychometric characteristics and reliability similar to conventional tests, sensitive for cognitive impairment. Should be used as a screening instrument and not as substitute for formal neuropsychological testing
COGDRAS Wesnes et al, 2010 51 76.5 (6.85) Mild and moderate AD with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors Good psychometric properties. Measures of psychomotor speed showed possible sensitivity for detecting decline over 6 months
Lepeleire, et al., 2005 152 80.01(7.13) HC Low sensitivity and specificity of subtests added to PBW battery in diagnosing dementia
Mindstreams (Neurotrax) Dwlatzky et al., 2010 170 ≥60 No impairment (7), questionable impairment (76), very mild (58), mild (26), moderate impairment (2), Performance differed significantly across groups (p<0.001) poorer overall battery performance for those with greater impairment
Doninger et al., 2009 27 MCI22HC MCI: 69.2(6.5)HC: 67.6(4.6) MCI and HC MCI performed poorly compared to HC participants in all domains, with significant differences in memory (p= .003; d= 0.96) executive function (p =.046; d=0.64), and overall battery performance (p=.041; d=0.63).
Fillit et al., 2008 2.888 64.7(18.2) Neurology (2.539); Primary care (286); Geriatrics (63) 83% rated the test easy to use (p<0.001),.
Doniger et al.,2006 GDS: 72CSDD: 88 GDS: 74.9 (6.9)CSDD: 78.4 (8.8) HC, MCI, mild AD Discriminated among MCI, mild AD, and HC participants following covariation for depression scale score in both cohorts, demonstrates that the battery is unaffected by depression
Doniger et al.,2005 161 69.1 (9.3) HC, MCI, mild dementia Discriminating between demented and non-demented individuals=AUC=0.886 (p<0.001). For discriminating between cognitively healthy individuals and non-cognitively healthy individuals AUC=0.823 (p<0.001)

SD: Standard Deviation; MCI: mild cognitive impairment; aMCI: amnestic mild cognitive impairment; AD: Alzheimer´s disease; FTD: frontotemporal dementia; DLB: dementia with Lewy bodies; HC: healthy control; GDS: Global Depression Scale; CSDD: Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia.