Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct-Dec;9(4):385–393. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642015DN94000385

Table 2.

Summary of key findings of the study.

A – [18F]FDG-PET analysis using SVC of the PCC with SPM8*
Comparisons Cluster size (mm3) pFWE p# Z score
AD × CG
    Right posterior cingulate gyrus 129 < 0.001 < 0.00001 7.49
    Left posterior cingulate gyrus 241 < 0.001 < 0.00001 7.56
MCI × CG No suprathreshold clusters (p >0.001)
B – Naa/mI MRS ROI**
Comparisons       p
AD × CG       0.024
MCI × CG       0.060
C – Correlation analysis
      Correlation p
[ 18 F] FDG-PET × Naa/mI     0.361 0.001
D – ROC curve analysis of the different PCC ROIs
      Area under the ROC curve
[ 18 F] FDG-PET     0.935
Naa/mI     0.708
*

Results at the peak voxel level (ANOVA and post-hoc unpaired t-test);

**

ANOVA and post-hoc unpaired t-test with SPSS;

#

p value uncorrected for multiple comparisons; pFWE: p value corrected for multiple comparisons with the familywise error method; MCI: Amnestic MCI; CG: Control group; SPM: statistical parametric mapping; SVC: small volume correction method, directed to the PCC.