Table 2.
Summary of key findings of the study.
A – [18F]FDG-PET analysis using SVC of the PCC with SPM8* | ||||
Comparisons | Cluster size (mm3) | pFWE | p# | Z score |
AD × CG | ||||
Right posterior cingulate gyrus | 129 | < 0.001 | < 0.00001 | 7.49 |
Left posterior cingulate gyrus | 241 | < 0.001 | < 0.00001 | 7.56 |
MCI × CG | No suprathreshold clusters (p >0.001) | |||
B – Naa/mI MRS ROI** | ||||
Comparisons | p | |||
AD × CG | 0.024 | |||
MCI × CG | 0.060 | |||
C – Correlation analysis | ||||
Correlation | p | |||
[ 18 F] FDG-PET × Naa/mI | 0.361 | 0.001 | ||
D – ROC curve analysis of the different PCC ROIs | ||||
Area under the ROC curve | ||||
[ 18 F] FDG-PET | 0.935 | |||
Naa/mI | 0.708 |
Results at the peak voxel level (ANOVA and post-hoc unpaired t-test);
ANOVA and post-hoc unpaired t-test with SPSS;
p value uncorrected for multiple comparisons; pFWE: p value corrected for multiple comparisons with the familywise error method; MCI: Amnestic MCI; CG: Control group; SPM: statistical parametric mapping; SVC: small volume correction method, directed to the PCC.