Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jun 30;75:399–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.036

Table 2.

Correlation between RPI beween measured indentation parameters (TID, IDI and CID) and imaging measurement of the indent size, the damage extent an porosity/pore proximity. The ‘Technique’ column indicates how many of the n sample measures are from micro computed tomography (CT) or fluorescence microscopy of the serial sectioned image stack (SS i.e. three dimensional measurements) or only the central slice (CS i.e. two dimensional measurements). The embolden cells indicate significant correlations (p < 0.05) and the italicisied cells indicate a p value less than 0.1 and hence close to significance.

Technique n TID IDI CID
Indent Indent Volume [µm3] 7CT, 6SS 13 0.29 0.63 0.32
Indent Area [µm2] 7CT, 1SS, 8CS 16 0.58 0.66 0.56
Indent Depth [µm] 7CT, 6SS, 3CS 16 0.71 0.78 0.65
Indent Depth [µm] 7CT 7 0.93 0.79 0.64
Indent Depth [µm] 9SS 9 0.44 0.59 0.53
Indent Diameter [µm] 7CT, 6SS, 3CS 16 0.76 0.82 0.75
Damage Crack Volume [µm3] 7CT 7 0.43 0.54 0.14
Damage Volume [µm3] 9SS 9 0.07 0.42 0.37
Damage Area [µm2] 12CS 12 0.46 0.64 0.50
Damage “Extent” [µm] 7CT, 9CS 16 0.55 0.54 0.41
Crack Length [µm] 7CT 7 0.79 0.71 0.21
Damage “Extent” [µm] 12CS 12 0.46 0.64 0.50
Pore Proximity to Pore [µm] 7CT, 6SS, 3CS 16 −0.33 −0.55 −0.19
Proximity to Pore [µm] 7CT 7 −0.36 −0.43 0.11
Proximity to Pore [µm] 9SS 9 0.11 0.18 0.37
Macro Porosity [%] 7CT 7 0.68 0.93 0.75