Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jul 13;62(15):6144–6163. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa77df

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Correlation between PAM and MRI data. (a) Amplitude: max. cavitation power vs. max. temperature rise. All of the data shown in Figure 7 and 8 is included, with 3 trials for each of the 6 conditions. (b) Location: peak in direction of FUS propagation observed with MRI thermometry vs. PAM. The data was analyzed in two groups based on the PSNE concentration: (i) Control and 2% PSNE (low/zero cavitation); (ii) 5–50% PSNE (cavitation). ρ = Pearson’s correlation coefficient, p = statistical significance from t-test.