Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 28;12(9):e0185662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185662

Table 2. Kinetic parameters of the interaction of immobilized rbFcRn and hFcRn with rbIgG and hIgG isotypes at pH 6.0.

rbFcRn hFcRn
KD1 (M)
x 10−9
f1 (%) KD2 (M)
x 10−9
f2 (%) KD1 (M)
x 10−9
f1 (%) KD2 (M)
x 10−9
f2 (%)
rbIgG 20.3 ± 2.21 68.4 49.3 ± 1.78 31.6 6.58 ± 0.12 77.0 15.9 ± 0.27 23.0
hIgG1 12.9 ± 1.83 28.8 71.9 ± 15.7 71.2 9.99 ± 0,43 42.4 57.2 ± 3.05 57.6
hIgG2 7.46 ± 1.41 84.3 106 ± 31.5 15.7 5.43 ± 0.26 89.2 34.7 ± 0.68 10.8
hIgG3 2.57 ± 0.52 49.9 59.2 ± 7.25 50.1 6.06 ± 0.25 74.8 17.4 ± 0.50 25.2
hIgG4 3.86 ± 0.79 89.8 53.5 ± 20.0 30.5 2.36 ± 0.14 92.1 20.2 ± 1.01 7.9

The KD values (mean ± S.E.) were calculated from the estimated association and dissociation rate constants (KD1 = kd1/ka1) and (KD2 = kd2/ka2) using heterogeneous ligand model during the fitting procedure (n = 2–3).