Table 3. Odds ratios for presence of serological markers for adult residents of hotspot villages compared to adult workers living in other villages (adjusted for age).

Presence of serological markers	Groups	Number tested	Number positive (%)	OddsRatio (OR)	p value
ICT	Residents of Fagali’i	38	7 (18.4)	20.4	<0.001
	Residents of Ili’ili/Vaitogi/Futiga	113	3 (2.7)	1.6	0.539
	Adult workers living in other villages	602	8 (1.3)	1
Og4C3 Ag >128	Residents of Fagali’i	38	7 (18.4)	51.9	<0.001
	Residents of Ili’ili/Vaitogi/Futiga	112	4 (3.6)	5.2	0.023
	Adult workers living in other villages	598	4 (0.7)	1
Og4C3 Ag >32	Residents of Fagali’i	38	8 (21.1)	31.8	<0.001
	Residents of Ili’ili/Vaitogi/Futiga	112	6 (5.4)	4.1	0.016
	Adult workers living in other villages	598	7 (1.2)	1
Antigen positive (ICT and/or Og4C3 Ag >32	Residents of Fagali’i	38	9 (23.7)	23.5	<0.001
	Residents of Ili’ili/Vaitogi/Futiga	113	6 (5.3)	2.6	0.098
	Adult workers living in other villages	602	9 (1.5)	1
Bm14 Ab	Residents of Fagali’i	38	17 (44.7)	5.7	<0.001
	Residents of Ili’ili/Vaitogi/Futiga	112	15 (13.4)	1.0	0.931
	Adult workers living in other villages	598	70 (11.7)	1
Wb123 Ab	Residents of Fagali’i	38	20 (52.6)	9.5	<0.001
	Residents of Ili’ili/Vaitogi/Futiga	112	22 (19.6)	2.3	0.014
	Adult workers living in other villages	598	65 (10.9)	1