Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 7;28(10):3089–3099. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017010108

Table 7.

Influence of immunosuppressive treatments on the outcomes of patients with TA-proteinuria >0.75 g/d and persistent hematuria

Variable All Patients, n=21 Treated, n=8 Nontreated, n=13 P Value
Baseline Scr, mg/dla 1.9±0.9 2±1.2 1.9±0.7 0.60
Baseline proteinuria, g/db 2.7 (1.2–4.4) 3.3 (1.3–5.6) 1.8 (1.2–3.3) 0.38
Baseline hematuria, RBC × hpfb 50 (28–100) 78 (33–100) 36 (14–87) 0.31
ESRD, no. (%) 11 (52) 4 (50) 7 (53.8) 0.86
50% Reduction in renal function, no. (%) 12 (57) 4 (50) 8 (61.5) 0.60
Rate of renal function decline, ml/min per 1.73 m2 per yra −5.67±7.20 −5.75±8.19 −5.63±6.87 0.97
TA-P before/after IS treatment, g/db 2.9 (1.2–5.7)/1 (0.44–2.5)c
TA-H before/after IS treatment, RBC × hpfb 75 (20–100)/12 (4–20)d
Rate of renal function decline before/after IS treatment, ml/min per 1.73 m2 per yra −10.2±12.7/−2±5.02e
IS treatments (%)
 CS monotherapy 0 (0)
 CS + MMF 5 (62)
 CS + AZA 2 (25)
 CS + CYC 1 (12)
Duration of CS treatment, moa 5.62±2.97
Cumulative dose of CS, mg/kgb 60 (44–66)

Scr, serum creatinine; TA-P, time-averaged proteinuria; IS, immunosuppressive treatment; TA-H, time-averaged hematuria; CS, corticosteroid; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; AZA, azathioprine; CYC, cyclophosphamide.

a

Mean±SD.

b

Median (interquartile range).

c

P=0.01.

d

P=0.02.

e

P=0.12.