Table 1.
Disadvantages of RCTs and advantages of OESs, determined by the characteristics of longitudinal evaluation in patients with prosthetic joint replacements (PJRs).
| Characteristics of the evaluation in PJR | RCTs (disadvantages) | OESs (advantages) |
|---|---|---|
| Permanent implants (unlimited follow-up) | Expensive studies with restrictive inclusion criteria and difficulty to follow-up an unlimited number of patients and procedures | Lower cost for long-term follow-up and possibility of including of an unlimited number of patients and procedures |
| Low-frequency if complications and significant prevalence in long-term follow-up | ||
| High number of patients and procedures | ||
| Real-world view, with different centers and surgeons involved (external validation) | Centers of excellence Few surgeons involved Report the reality of the institution (limited generalization) |
Participation of a large number of centers and surgeons (generalization is possible) |
| Cross-sectional evaluations (survival curves) | Unusual practice (predetermined periods) | Usual practice (longitudinal-to-endpoint) |
| Number of exposure factors and outcomes (simultaneous) | Limited | Multiple |
RCTs, controlled and randomized controlled trials; OESs, observational epidemiological studies.