Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 28;7:12373. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12019-w

Table 2.

Mean levels of basal perfusion pressure of the both rats’ strain (SHR and WKY) treated with egg-lecithin (SL) and not treated control group (C).

SHR-SL (n = 15) SHR-C (n = 15) WKY-SL (n = 11) WKY-C (n = 11)
Mean ± SEM Mean ± SEM Mean ± SEM Mean ± SEM
PP 1 [mmHg] 52.48* ± 1.09 62.04 ± 1.74 50.01* ± 1.56 41.30 ± 1.55
PP 2 [mmHg] - Infusion NE 86.81*A ± 2.72 101.32A ± 2.67 58.95A ± 1.94 60.01A ± 2.68
PP 3 [mmHg]- Infusion NE + L-NOARG 91.94* ± 3.07 114.16B ± 3.70 54.22 ± 1.55 60.90 ± 2.78
PP T [mmHg] 76.75* ± 1.68 92.20 ± 2.04 53.52 ± 0.97 53.54 ± 1.47

PP1 [mmHg] – basal perfusion pressure in the first stage of the study. PP2 [mmHg] - perfusion pressure during the infusion NE, second stage of study. PP3 [mmHg] - basal perfusion pressure during the infusion NE + L-NOARG, third stage of study. PPT [mmHg] - mean basal perfusion pressure of all perfusions’ stages. *P < 0.05, compared to the control group (SL vs. C). AP < 0.05, significant increase of perfusion pressure inside the group caused by NE infusion (PP1 vs. PP2). BP < 0.05, significant increase of perfusion pressure inside the group caused by NE + L-NOARG infusion (PP2 vs. PP3).