Table 1. Published reports on single-incision gastrectomy.
| Author | Year | Type of surgery | Patients | Length of incision (cm) | Additional port | Product of single port | OT (min) | EBL (mL) | LNs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omori et al. [5] | 2011 | Distal | 7 | 2.5 | Two 2 mm ports | Conventional trocar | 344 | 25 | 67 |
| Park et al. [8] | 2012 | Distal | 2 | 2.5 | One 2 mm port | OCTO | 275 | 85 | 32 |
| Kong et al. [30] | 2012 | Distal | 4 | 2–3 | No | Conventional trocar | 280 | 162 | 16 |
| Omori et al. [31] | 2012 | Distal | 20 | 2.5 | Two 2 mm ports | SILS | NA | NA | NA |
| Ahn et al. [10] | 2014 | Distal | 22 | 2.5 | No | Gloveport | 175 | NA | NA |
| Omori et al. [32] | 2014 | Distal | 45 | 2.5–3 | No | EZ access | 236 | NA | NA |
| Ahn et al. [18] | 2014 | Distal | 50 | 2.5 | No | Gloveport | 144 | 50 | 52 |
| Ahn et al. [20] | 2014 | Distal | 14 | 2.5 | No | Gloveport | NA | NA | 61.3 |
| Suh et al. [11] | 2015 | Distal | 11 | 2.5 | No | Gloveport | 214 | NA | NA |
| Kim et al. [33] | 2015 | Distal | 30 | 3–3.5 | No | GelPort | 122 | 103 | 40 |
| Kim et al. [17] | 2016 | Distal | 48 | 3–3.5 | No | GelPort | 135 | 101 | 35 |
| Omori et al. [27] | 2016 | Distal | 90 | 2.5–3 | No | EZ access | 261 | 44 | 60 |
| Ahn et al. [12] | 2014 | Total | 2 | 2.5 | No | Gloveport | 190 | 85 | 77 |
| Ertem et al. [34] | 2013 | Total | 1 | 3.5 | No | OCTO | 282 | NA | 34 |
| Ahn et al. [35] | 2015 | Total | 4 | 2.5 | No | Gloveport | 206 | 53 | 55 |
| Lee et al. [13] | 2016 | Proximal | 1 | 2.5 | No | Gloveport | 350 | NA | 22 |
Manufacturer information is follow as: OCTO (DalimSurgNET, Seoul, Korea), SILS (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland), Gloveport (Nelis, Bucheon, Korea), EZ access (Hakko, Nagano, Japan), GelPort (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA).
OT= operation time; EBL= estimated blood loss; LNs= numbers of retrieved lymph nodes; SILS = single-incision laparoscopic surgery; NA= not applicable.