. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Jul 13;85(10):950–965. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000226

Table 7.

Unstandardized Coefficients from Prediction of Intercept and Slope from Latent Growth Curve Model of Intimate Partner Aggression from Ages 18–23 Years

	Intimate partner aggression growth curve parameters

	DV = Intercept			DV = Slope
Predictor:	b	SE	p	b	SE	p
Main Effects
Intercept	–	–	–	−.149	.046	.001
Sex (0=male, 1=female)	.403	.128	.002	.006	.024	.798
Race (0=EA¹, 1=AA²)	.609	.249	.015	.006	.035	.856
Socioeconomic status	−.149	.073	.041	−.008	.016	.625
Socioeconomic status × sex	−.081	.127	.522	.004	.023	.859
Resistance to control temperament	.033	.056	.554	.020	.009	.031
Antisocial behavior	.061	.102	.551	−.027	.017	.120
Psychopathic traits	.282	.082	.001	.007	.020	.719
IJS/FOA	.291	.094	.002	−.002	.017	.915
Friend antisocial behavior	−.113	.071	.115	.047	.018	.011
Parent-child relationship	−.037	.068	.592	−.005	.011	.627
Moderated/Interaction Effects
Friend behavior × RTC	.015	.058	.789	.026	.011	.025
Friend behavior × sex	−.010	.132	.940	−.061	.024	.011
Parent-child relationship × RTC	−.110	.050	.028	.006	.014	.684
Parent-child relationship × sex	−.258	.134	.053	−.012	.026	.646

Note. RTC = Resistance to control temperament. Statistically significant (p < .05) effects in bold.

N = 466.

European American;

African American.