Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;8(40):68530–68541. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19708

Table 1. Preoperative diagnosis based on endometrial biopsy, pelvic MRI and FDG-PET/CT, and corresponding final histological diagnosis at hysterectomy in patients with CAH and EECG1.

Postoperative diagnosis from hysterectomy specimen
Preoperative diagnosis from endometrial biopsy, n (%) n=238 CAH (n=110) n (%) EECG1 (n=128) n (%) p-valuea
CAH, n=74 (31) 71 (96) 3 (4) <0.001
Inconclusive, n=68 (29) 39 (57) 29 (43)
EECG1, n= 96 (40) 0 (0) 96 (100)
MRI finding n=117 CAH (n=23) n (%) EECG1 (n=94) n (%) p-valueb
No or barely visible tumor 9 (39) 0 (0) <0.001
Visible tumor 14 (61) 94 (100)
Myometrial invasion
 No or <50% 23 (100) 63 (67) 0.001
 >50% 0 (0) 31 (33)
Cervical stroma infiltration
 No 23 (100) 88 (94) 0.60
 Yes 0 (0) 6 (6)
Enlarged pelvic lymph nodes
 No 21 (91) 92 (98) 1.0
 Yes 2(9)c 2 (2)
FDG-PET/CT finding n=69 CAH (n=10) n (%) EECG1 (n=59) n (%) p-valueb
No visible tumor 4 (40) 1 (2) 0.001
Increased tumor avidity 6 (60) 58 (98)
Cervical FDG-avidity
 No 10 (100) 48 (81) 0.40
 Yes 0 (0) 11 (19)
Enlarged FDG avid lymph nodes
 No 9 (90) 56 (95) 0.50
 Yes 1 (10)d 3 (50)

aPearson Chi-Square test. bFisher's Exact Test. cTwo patients with lymphadenopathy in the pelvis and groin due to lymphoma. dOne patient with enlarged lymph nodes due to lymphoma. Significant p-values are given in bold.