Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 14;49(3):184–193. doi: 10.3947/ic.2017.49.3.184

Table 3. Trends in antimicrobial resistance rates of Enterobacteriaceae during the study period (n = 998).

Antibiotics Susceptibility rates, n (%) P-value
2012 (n = 181) 2013 (n = 216) 2014 (n = 184) 2015 (n = 216) 2016 (n = 201)
AMP 122 (67.4) 144 (66.7) 119 (64.7) 132 (61.1) 128 (63.7) 0.222
AMC 32 (17.7) 44 (23.9) 51 (23.6) 40 (19.9) 0.298
TZP 5 (4.1) 6 (2.8) 6 (3.3) 6 (2.8) 10 (5.0) <0.001
FOX 16 (8.8) 22 (10.2) 30 (16.3) 19 (8.8) 15 (7.5) 0.498
CTX 19 (10.5) 27 (12.5) 31 (16.8) 27 (12.5) 31 (15.4) 0.220
CAZ 3 (1.7) 6 (2.8) 6 (7.1) 7 (3.2) 10 (5.0) 0.117
FEM 0 (0) 4 (1.9) 7 (3.8) 6 (2.8) 7 (3.5) 0.027
ATM 8 (4.4) 11 (5.1) 16 (8.7) 11 (5.1) 14 (7.0) 0.362
EPM 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (1.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) <0.001
IPM 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (1.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) <0.001
FQa 43 (23.8) 48 (22.2) 52 (28.3) 46 (21.3) 43 (21.4) 0.546
GEN 40 (22.1) 42 (19.4) 49 (26.6) 32 (14.8) 38 (18.9) 0.214
AMK 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.458
TMP/SMX 58 (32.0) 74 (34.3) 60 (32.6) 62 (28.7) 62 (30.8) 0.419

aCiprofloxacin and/or levofloxacin

AMP, ampicillin; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; FOX, cefoxitin; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; ATM, aztreonam; EPM, ertapenem; IPM, imipenem; FQ, fluoroquinolones; GEN, gentamicin; AMK, amikacin; TMP/SMX, trimethoprime-sulfamethoxazole