Table A2.

Effective index Bézier curve coefficients for h = 300 nm.

${\mathit{E}}_{\mathit{i},\mathit{j}}$	h = 300 nm, TE${}_0$
j↓ / i→	0	1	2	3	4	5
0	1.8776213	2.122918	1.8338975	2.1035948	1.9577628	1.9983654
1	1.5934236	2.0444746	1.5628135	1.9956184	1.7710133	1.8322354
2	1.4362759	2.1394231	1.3769242	2.1079449	1.7048331	1.8222323
3	1.1819761	1.6413274	1.7166467	1.404391	1.7171903	1.6057694
4	1.8481478	0.40673147	3.3983956	0.50210963	2.1211686	1.6983453
5	1.0641421	2.472913	−0.55656357	3.0907673	0.83795738	1.5242143
6	1.6845798	0.71592265	2.9017514	0.43428066	2.0751221	1.5781534
7	1.2956966	1.786315	0.68464599	2.0493862	1.1950669	1.4802472
8	1.4635626	1.2874377	1.7004149	1.2467895	1.5764815	1.4858896
9	1.3965793	1.4399491	1.3459126	1.4839961	1.4166315	1.4509043
10	1.3994648	1.3942841	1.4113342	1.4091712	1.4289707	1.4336455
11	1.3863866	1.3867627	1.3895039	1.3997934	1.4072365	1.4142388
$E_{i,j}$	h = 300 nm, TM${}_0$
j↓ / i→	0	1	2	3	4	5
0	1.8887401	2.0011959	1.8974288	1.9885233	1.9436535	1.9559063
1	1.609455	1.8264855	1.6515491	1.8019914	1.7310931	1.7505446
2	1.4640987	1.8261739	1.486507	1.802394	1.6385824	1.6865425
3	1.0822236	1.5366187	1.2886216	1.4596529	1.4286029	1.4308623
4	2.048853	0.63601297	2.8696145	0.84074835	1.9212071	1.6511395
5	0.82208993	2.5255386	−0.52650071	2.6367929	0.87419927	1.3632737
6	1.8738947	0.55886964	3.0985097	0.38808082	1.9833192	1.5423074
7	1.1896482	1.9091798	0.48595616	2.0705861	1.1322182	1.4061594
8	1.5039653	1.2294982	1.7920095	1.1714497	1.5558812	1.4495353
9	1.3849656	1.4550945	1.3147574	1.481189	1.3848654	1.4170576
10	1.3981807	1.3935368	1.4080525	1.396063	1.4087057	1.4083623
11	1.3810528	1.3913508	1.3786745	1.3942946	1.3896421	1.3937298