Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;17(9):1984. doi: 10.3390/s17091984

Table 2.

Comparison of different methods for ENRO determination in various samples

Methods Sensitivity LOD Required Time Reuse Cycles Samples References
Direct ELISA 20.0 ng·g−1 1.3 ng·g−1 >4.5 h Once feed [15]
Quantum dot-based fluoroimmunoassay 1–100 ng·mL−1 2.5 ng·mL−1 >30 min Once Chicken muscle [23]
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy - 10 ng·mL−1 40 min Once Chicken muscle [41]
Microarray analyses - 5 ng·kg−1 >1 h - Beef, pork and chicken [42]
Immunoassay strip 0.038–22.75 ng·mL−1 0.935 ng·mL−1
(by scanner and eye)
5 min Once Chicken muscle [43]
Impedimetric immunosensors 1–1000 ng·mL−1 1.0 ng·mL−1 - - Blood [44]
Electrochemiscal immunobiosensor 0.01–10 ng·mL−1 10 pg·mL−1 10–15 min - Milk, stream water [45]
Portable SPR sensor 26.4 ± 7.2 μg·L−1 2.0 ± 0.2 μg·L−1 <30 min Once Milk [46]
SPR immunosensor 3.8 ng·mL−1 1.2 ng·mL−1 About 6 min At least 100 times Pure milk, egg, chicken muscle, beef and fish This research